(1.) THIS criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellant (original accused no. 2 of S.T. No. 619 of 2003) as he has been mainly punished under Section 304 Part II of I.P.C. for 10 years R.I. and he has also been punished under various other sections of I.P.C. and all the sentences have been ordered to be run concurrently by the learned trial court. This Court has admitted this criminal appeal by order dated 14th May, 2013 and the records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 619 of 2003 was called for from the trial court so as to appreciate the arguments for suspension of sentence.
(2.) THIS Court has received the records and proceedings of the Sessions Trial No. 619 of 2003. We have perused the same and heard the counsel for both the sides at length for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C.
(3.) THEREFORE , there is no substance in the prayer for suspension of sentence and the same is hereby rejected.