SATYA NARAIN PASWAN. Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have not paid either provisional pension or final pension to him even after lapse of more than four years from the date of his retirement on 31st January, 2009.

(2.) IT has been submitted that the petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31st January, 2009 from the post of Dy.S.P., Vigilance Department, Government of Jharkhand. Certain service dues have also not been paid to the petitioner, such as the benefit of Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP).

(3.) LEARNED J.C. to A.G. appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that steps have been taken on behalf of the State respondents and the required orders and documents have been sent to the office of the Accountant General.