DHARAM DEO NARAYAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE appellant is aggrieved against the part refusal of relief in his writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3170 of 2002 and thereby denial of counting of his past service rendered in two institutions; Deep Narayan Singh Regional Institute of Co -operative Management, Patna as a librarian and in Bokaro Steel Plant of Steel Authority of India Limited ( in short "SAIL").

(3.) APPELLANT 's second prayer was with respect to counting of service rendered by the appellant in Deep Narayan Singh Regional Institute of Co -operative Management, Patna and Bokaro Steel Plant of SAIL. The appellant's said prayer was rejected by learned Single Judge for want of sufficient pleadings as well as unavailability of materials on record. The appellant being aggrieved against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 26th March, 2003 preferred this L.P.A. being L.P.A. No. 257 of 2003. The appellant's L.P.A was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide a brief order dated 10th August, 2004. The appellant then preferred a review petition being Civil Review No. 100 of 2004, which was also dismissed by this Court vide order dated 6th December, 2005. Aggrieved against the order passed in Civil Review No. 100 of 2004, the appellant preferred a S.L.P.(C) No. 21497 of 2006, which was allowed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and was consequently converted into Civil Appeal No. 2630 of 2009. Vide order dated 17th March, 2009, the Hon'ble Supreme Court after considering the circular and instruction issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Department of Education, New Delhi and other documents, found that the above documents were relevant material for the purpose of deciding the review petition and, therefore, after setting aside the order referred above, remanded the matter to this Court for deciding the review application afresh. The appellant's Review Petition No. 100 of 2004 was allowed by this Court vide order dated 11th February, 2013. Hence, this L.P.A has come up for consideration before us.