SANAUL SK Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State.

(2.) THE F.I.R of Rajmahal (Radhanagar) P.S. Case no.334 of 2012 instituted under Sections 341, 342, 323, 376 of the Indian Penal Code is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the parties, i.e, prosecutrix and the petitioner no.1 have resolved their dispute whereby petitioner no.1 has married the prosecutrix and both are living happily. Learned counsel appearing appearing for the petitioners submits that in such situation, F.I.R should be quashed, in view of the decision rendered in a case of Arun Goel vs.State of N.C.T of Delhi and another, [Special Leave to Appeal (Cr.) No.2900 of 2009].

(3.) THIS factual position is being admitted by the learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party no.2.