LAWS(JHAR)-2013-7-106

RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On July 05, 2013
RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents for payment of arrear of salary to the petitioner from October, 2001 till 17th May, 2005. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Junior Engineer by Public Works Department, Government of Bihar on 27.2.1973 and he submitted his joining on 3.8.1973 Vide order dated 24.1.2002 the petitioner was transferred and posted to Works Division, Baghmara in place of one Tirath Narayan Jha where he has submitted his joining on 25.1.2002. On 14.2.2002, the transfer of said Tirath Narayan Jha was cancelled and by order dated 11.5.2002 the services of the petitioner was placed in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad where he discharged his duties till 13.12.2004. Thereafter, he was transferred to Works Division, Chas. The petitioner performed his duties between 13.12.2004 to 17.5.2005 at Works Division, Chas and he was again transferred to Works Division, Dhanbad on 17.5.2005. As the petitioner's salary between the period October, 2001 till 17.5.2005 was not paid, though he continued discharging the duties at different places where he was posted, he has moved this Court.

(2.) A counter affidavit has been filed admitting that the petitioner was transferred in place of Tirath Narayan Jha and the transfer of said Tirath Narayan Jha was stayed and therefore, payment could not be made to the petitioner, as in the said office there was only one sanctioned post against which the said Tirath Narayan Jha was posted. Paragraph Nos. 12 to 15 of the counter affidavit dated 15.2.2011 filed on behalf of the respondent No. 4 are extracted below:--

(3.) A supplementary counter affidavit dated 16.1.2012 has been filed by respondent No. 4 bringing on record an office order dated 5.1.2012 whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the period between 3.2.2002 and 19.8.2005 has been treated as unauthorised absence.