GARIBA MEHTA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. It reveals that the accused persons forcibly cut away mustard crops belonging to the informant. When they raised objection, accused persons caused injuries on their persons by means of lathi, tangi. In the incident, three persons sustained injuries out of whom two have sustained grievous injuries.

(2.) IT is submitted that the injury report has been managed by the doctor, as the description of injury does not suggest to be grievous in nature. No specific allegation is made against any of the accused.

(3.) CONSIDERING manner of occurrence and the allegation levelled, I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Mohammadganj PS case No. 5 of 2012 pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Daltonganj (Palamau). Accordingly, prayer is rejected and this application is dismissed.