SANKADEEP SAHU Vs. RANCHI UNIVERSITY, RANCHI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge in W. P. (S) No. 4915 of 2005 dated 11th February, 2013.

(2.) COUNSEL appearing for the appellants submitted that the appellants have worked from the year 1989, approximately for two years and other employees have been regularised into the service, whereas these appellants have been discriminated. This aspect of the matter has not been properly appreciated by the learned Single Judge and hence, the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge deserves to be quashed and set aside.

(3.) HAVING heard the counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge, we see no reason to entertain this Letters Patent Appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons: