REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Jyotish Rana Appellant

V/S

STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

NAGENDRA NATH BORA LIKHIRAM COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM RAFIULLAH KHAN VS. COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM:BHANURAM PAGU:BHANURAM PEGU:AMULYA PRASAD CHALIHA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. BIDYABHUSHAN MOHAPATRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. S SREE RAMA RAO [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. CHITRA VENKATA RAO [REFERRED TO]
HUSSAINI VS. HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD [REFERRED TO]
MEENA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
NARENDRA MOHAN ARYA VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD [REFERRED TO]
HARJIT SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. GYAN CHAND CHATTAR [REFERRED TO]
MOHD YUNUS KHAN VS. STATE OF UP [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR VS. NEMI CHAND NALWAYA [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA PRASAD SHUKLA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Challenge to order dated 02.05.2005 dismissing the petitioner from service and order dated 17.08.2005 whereby the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected, is primarily founded on two grounds, namely;

(2.) A counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in which it has been stated that the petitioner was afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself and the enquiry was conducted by following the principles of natural justice. The charge against the petitioner was grave and on the basis of the materials on record, the enquiry officer found the charge proved which has been accepted by the disciplinary as well as the appellate authority. A counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondent No. 4 also reiterating the stand taken by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

(3.) Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents on record.

Click here to view full judgment.

JYOTISH RANA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address