RAJENDRA PRASAD SAH Vs. BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Aggrieved by the order of compulsory retirement dated 29.11.2001, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. The appellate order dated 16.5.2002 and the revisional order dated 21.10.2002 have also been challenged by the petitioner in the present proceeding.

(2.) The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner was appointed as a clerk. The charge memo dated 26.04.1999 containing various charges was served upon the petitioner and an enquiry was conducted. The enquiry report dated 30th April, 2000 was submitted finding the charge no.-1 and charge no.-3 partially proved. A further enquiry was ordered and the second enquiry report dated 23.09.2000 was submitted finding the charge no.-3 also proved. Charges framed under the charge no.-1 was found proved/partially as has been found in the first enquiry report. Charge nos. 2 and 4 were not found proved. Aggrieved by this, the petitioner preferred an appeal which was dismissed on 16.05.2002 and revision application preferred by the petitioner has also been dismissed on 21.10.2002.

(3.) A counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating as under: