KISHUN GOPE Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I .A. No. 1952 of 2012 has been filed for amendment in the prayer portion of the main writ application by inserting the following paragraphs:-

(2.) FROM perusal of aforesaid proposed prayer, it is clear that petitioner had made certain allegation against the Officer In-Charge of Kurdeg Police Station that he has not investigated the case properly in respect of distribution of Indira Awas. It is also alleged that the said Officer In-Charge had tampered with the record and compelled the petitioner to give the benefit to the accused persons. It is an admitted position that petitioner is the informant of Kurdeg P.S. Case No. 2 of 2011. Under the said circumstances, if petitioner had any grievance regarding the submission of charge sheet, he ought to have filed a protest petition in the court below. There is nothing in this I.A. to show that petitioner has filed any protest petition. Moreover, if petitioner has any grievance regarding the Officer In-Charge of the Kurdeg Police Station that he has manipulated or tampered with the records, then petitioner ought to have filed a separate case against him before the appropriate forum. Under the said circumstance, I find no merit in I.A. No. 1952 of 2012 and the same is disposed of.