PURUSOTTAM LAL RUNGTA Vs. RAAJESH KASERA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD .

(2.) THIS civil revision application has been preferred by the petitioners against an order dated 3.5.2011 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Ranchi, in Execution Case no. 9 of 2008.

(3.) IT is contended that the opposite parties have also filed Eviction Suit vide Title Suit No. 57 of 1993 before the court of Sub Judge IX, Ranchi, in which the petitioners have succeeded and the learned sub Judge has held that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. Against the judgment pronounced by the learned Sub Judge, the opposite parties have preferred First Appeal being Title Appeal No. 4 of 2007 before the learned District Judge in which judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court was set aside and the opposite parties were directed to be evicted from the suit premises. Thereafter, the petitioners preferred Second Appeal No. 105 of 2008 before this Court which has been admitted and is now sub judice. He has also pointed out that the petitioners have also preferred Writ Petition (C) No. 3880 of 2007 before this Court, but the said writ petition stood dismissed for non prosecution. The petitioners have also filed C.M.P no. 130 of 2012 for restoration of the said writ petition.