BIJAY KUMAR MAHATO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN view of the averments made in the application, this interlocutory application is allowed.

(2.) HEARD counsel for both the parties and perused the documents on record.

(3.) A counteraffidavit has been filed taking a plea that, since the father of the petitioner died on 03.07.2005 and a decision was taken by the Government on 16.07.2008 extending benefits to the dependents of the employee who was later on shifted to the regular establishment, the benefit under the said decision, cannot be extended to the petitioner.