FULLORA GHOSH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) PETITIONER is seeking quashing of the selection of respondent no. 7, Smt. Chaina Mandal dated 12.9.2012 as made by the respondent no.6, the Child Development Project Officer, Kundahit.

(3.) IT is the case of the petitioner that at the time of making her application she had submitted B.A. Part I marks for being considered for appointment as Aanganwari Sevika, which is annexed as Annexure -9. However, in the said selection exercise the respondent no. 7, who is Intermediate in Arts has been selected and appointed while the petitioner being the candidate having Intermediate in Science qualification has been refused selection. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents ought to have considered the B.A Part I qualification of the petitioner as higher qualification in the matter of selection which could have accorded preference to her above the private respondent no. 7. It is also submitted that the Intermediate of Science candidate should have been given preference and as per the scheme evaluation of marks ought to have been done on the basis of Matric qualification in which petitioner would have certainly succeeded.