LAL BAHADUR MAHTO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents for payment of salary since the date of appointment, that is, 15.10.1992.

(2.) THE brief facts as stated in the writ petition are that, the petitioner was appointed on 15.10.1992 as Assistant Teacher. His appointment was approved by Government authorities still, he was not paid his salary and therefore, he made representations on 28.04.2000 and 09.08.2001. Since the representations were not decided, he was constrained to move this High Court by filing the present writ petition.

(3.) THE learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has confined his argument only to the proposition that even if it is admitted that the service of the petitioner was terminated on 01.10.2001, though he has instructions from his client that they are still working in hope that their services would be regularized, the petitioner is entitled for the payment of salary between the period 15.10.1992 and 01.10.2001.