MANIK RATAN BANERJEE Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY Court: Heard counsel for the parties.

(2.) BY the impugned order dated 24th January 2003 contained at Annexure -11 passed by the Disciplinary Authority -cum -General Manager (GB) of the respondent State Bank of India, the petitioner has been dismissed from service. He preferred an appeal before the Chief General Manager -cum -Appellate Authority of the respondent Bank vide Annexure -12 which was also dismissed by speaking order dated 18th June 2003 (Annexure -13).

(3.) THEREAFTER , it appears that the inquiry was conducted by the Inquiry Officer R.K. Jaiswal and the Inquiry Report was submitted on 25th July 2002 (Annexure -8). It however appears that a truncated document has been filed as Inquiry Report on the part of the petitioner and no statement has been made in the writ petition to allege that the petitioner was not supplied with the complete inquiry report. As a matter of fact, even in the Memo of Appeal which is annexed as Annexure -12 after imposition of punishment of dismissal by the Disciplinary Authority, there is no such ground taken that full Inquiry Report was not served upon him.