UPENDRA KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Counsel for the parties. Petitioner has sought more compensation on account of 75% disability incurred by him during the course of his duty in Kargil Area while posted under the respondent Border Security Force in the year 1995.

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner has stated that another person contable T. Kujur who has sustained 75% disablement, was granted compensation of Rs. 11,00,556.00 while a sum of Rs. 5,37,960.00 was paid to the petitioner for his disability, although T. Kujur was declared 65% disabled.

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioner however, has assailed the calculation of the compensation by the respondents by alleging that the other person was only 65% disabled but has been shown to be 100% disabled.