SIYARAM RAI Vs. DHANBAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I .A. No. 216/13 Counsel for the petitioner does not intend to press the instant I.A. Accordingly, it is dismissed. However, counsel for the petitioner submits that the main writ application was preferred for directing the official respondents of Dhanbad Municipal Corporation to pay certain admitted dues along with statutory interest relating to the security deposit under Contract Nos. F2 -2/08 -09 and F2 -1/08 -09. It is submitted that during the pendency of the writ application, the grievance of the petitioner relating to Contract No. F2 -2/08 -09 has beer redressed and by virtue of I.A. No. 3446/12 preferred earlier by him, he has been allowed to withdraw his claim relating to the said contract.

(2.) HOWEVER , it is submitted that for the subsisting grievance relating to the claim of certain outstanding dues in relation to Contract No. F2 -1/08 -09, respondents may be directed to consider and dispose of the representation earlier preferred by him being Annexure -4, by passing a reasoned and speaking order.