SUBODH PRASAD Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD both the sides.

(2.) THE petitioner has challenged an-nexure-13 of the writ petition whereby and whereunder the respondent no. 5 rejected the representation of the petitioner, which was to be disposed of in compliance of the order passed in CWJC No. 10106 of 2000.

(3.) I revert to maintainability of the impugned order on the point of jurisdiction Admittedly this matter is covered under the provision of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Section 88 Clause (1) reads as follows :