NAWAL KISHORE MISHRA Vs. ARIEL MIHSRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) MR . P.R. Bhagat, Advocate, was present on behalf of opposite party No. 1 on 20.6.2003 and was also heard and the revision application was disposed of on the said date, but his name was not typed for O.P. No. 1. It is Malindo Marandi Versus State Of Bihar pointed out that inadvertently certain typographical errors were committed in the order, namely, for the opposite party the word 'none ' was typed and in the 1st and 2nd line of the order Partition Suit No. '114 of 1982 ' was typed '14 of 1982 ' and date of compromise petition was typed as '16.2.1986 ' in place of '16.12.1986 '. These typographical errors are corrected. Consequently certified copy of the order be also corrected accordingly.