(1.) HEAD the parties.
(2.) PETITIONERS seek regularisation of their services. Petitioner No. 1 was appointed on 1.1.1985 as daily wages basis. Petitioner No. 2 was appointed on 1.2.1985 and petitioner No. 3 was appointed on 1.4.1985 on daily wages basis under the respondents. This fact has been categorically admitted in paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit.
(3.) HAVING regard to the fact that admittedly petitioners were appointed before 1.8.1985 and they have been continuously and regularly working, respondents should consider the case of the petitioners for their absorption/regularization in service and take final decision as expeditiously as possible.