TAPAN KUMAR MUKHERJEE Vs. PAULUS SOREN AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of opposite parties. Inspite of service of notice the opposite parties have not appeared, hence this Civil Revision Application is disposed of.

(2.) THIS revision application is directed against the order dated 7.8. 2002 passed by the Sub Judge IXth, Ranchi in Miscellaneous Case No. 3 of 1999 whereby he has rejected the Miscellaneous Case No. 3 of 1999 and refused to restore the Execution Case No. 2 of 1984.

(3.) IT appears that in support of his case, the petitioner -decree holder examined witnesses. The Court below refused to restore the case mainly on the ground that the petitioner was careless and the cause shown is unsatisfactory.