DANIEL HANSDA Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. K. N. Prasad. Senior Advocate, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Pradip Modi. G.P.I for the Respondents.

(2.) THE Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 03.12.1999 passed by the Regional Deputy Director, Health Service Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka by which a direction has been issued upon the Civil Surgeon to terminate the services of the Petitioners within one week and submit compliance report. Subsequently by order dated 29.03.2000 the aforementioned order dated 03.12.1999 was given effect to by the Civil Surgeon, Godda terminating services of the Petitioner and others and by reason of the said order it was further directed to recover the amounts received by them.

(3.) THUS , it is, therefore, absolutely clear that the Respondents acted in utter haste and terminated the services of the Petitioners without waiting for the report of the committee indicated above.