GOPALJI SAHAY Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) PETITIONER by way of this interlocutory application has prayed that the State of Jharkhand and its officers be added as party respondents in this case. In view of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, this interlocutory application is allowed. The State of Jharkhand and its officers as described in Paragraph -2 are added as party respondents in this case. C.W.J.C. No. 428 of 1995 (R)Heard the parties in the main writ petition. The Supreme Court remanded this matter by order dated 6.9.1999 passed in Civil Appeal No. 4985 of 1999 for consideration of the question whether the following four items are payable to the petitioner or not: ''

(3.) RE . Claim (b) ''The college has stated in the counter affidavit filed on 18.3.1996 that "so far payment of 14 days earned leave the General Body has decided on 19.8.1995 for payment of the extra classes taken during the Puja Vacations of 1987. The petitioner is requested to take this amount at his earliest convenience." This claim was not involved in the aforesaid judgment. The petitioner became entitled to this claim only on 19.8.1995 when a decision was taken to pay for the extra classes. As per the petitioner 'scalculation, this amount comes to Rs. 2,636.95. Learned counsel for the college could not dispute the correctness of calculation. We direct the college to calculate and pay this amount along with interest on it at the rate of 10% per annum from 19.8.1995 to 18.3.1996, when this amount was offered to the petitioner in the counter affidavit.