BASUDEO MAHTO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been preferred for issuance of appropriate writ(s) / order (s)/direction(s), particularly writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to stay the departmental proceeding pursuant to the charge -sheet dated 6th June, 2003 (Annexure -2) till conclusion of the criminal proceeding in which the petitioner is an accused.

(2.) FURTHER prayer has been made to set aside the second charge -sheet dated 5th July, 2003 (Annexure -4) and the third charge -sheet dated 15th July, 2003 (Annexure -6), as according to petitioner, they are same and similar as that of the first charge -sheet dated 6th June, 2003.

(3.) SO far as the Memo No. 250/c, dated 15th July, 2003 and Memo No. 1240, dated 21st July, 2003 are concerned, it is the "imputation of charges" which has been communicated later, having not been communicated with the charge -sheet.