EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ROPE-WAYS OF BHARAT COKING COAL LTD., DHANBAD Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT.INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEAR Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner and M.K. Laik, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

(2.) AT the very outset Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed permission to add Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the Cause Title of the Writ Application. Let him do so during the course of the day. However, he is directed to deposit additional Court Fee within a period of one week from the date of signing of this judgment.

(3.) MR . Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned workman did not perform any activity that was connected with the ultimate output of the Management nor was it connected with mining activities and that his nature of job was neither permanent nor perennial. He has further submitted that in the absence of any employer '' employee relationship, the Management could not be directed to regularize the concerned workman.