KARISHMA BARLA Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WHEN the case was taken up Mr. R. Krishna learned counsel for the respondents raised preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ application in view of the Annexures A and B to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 and 5, i.e. the order passed by the Patna High Court in CWJC No. 5945 of 1999 and CWJC No. 7978 of 1999.

(2.) HEARD Mr. V. Shivnath learned counsel for the petitioners on the point of maintainability of the writ application.

(3.) THE present writ application is also based on identical facts and therefore, relying on the orders of the Patna High Court quoted above, it is held that the present writ application is not maintainable. Accordingly it is dismissed.