SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the parties on I.A. No. 569 of 2012. Perused the papers.

(2.) The learned counsel for the respondent-State has no objection, if the amendment application is allowed.

(3.) The petitioner has died during the pendency of this writ petition and therefore, being a legal heir of the petitioner, i.e. the widow, Pushpa Devi, wife of late Sunil Kumar Pandey, submitted an application to implead/substitute her as petitioner.