JAGESHWAR BARAIK Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has applied for the post of Constable Driver in pursuance of the public advertisement, issued by the respondents, which is at Annexure5 to the memo of the petition.

(2.) IT is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already taken training of Home Guard in the year 1994 and he has got good driving ability and has appeared in the written test and cleared the same, but, in the driving test, the petitioner secured 33 marks out of total 50 marks. The passing marks or the minimum marks is 40 and the petitioner has secured less than minimum marks, but, as the petitioner is a Home Guard, his case should have been considered by the respondents in the reserved category quota and he should have been appointed as Constable Driver.

(3.) IN view of the aforesaid facts and reasons, there is no substance in this writ petition and, hence, the same is, hereby, dismissed.