BIJLI MAHATO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition has been preferred mainly challenging the Order dated 10th October, 2008 (Annexure-3 to the memo of the petition) as well as the order dated 17th September, 2008 (Annexure-4 to the memo of the petition) passed by the respondents for the reason that the services of the petitioner have been terminated without giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Neither the copies of the complaint received from the villagers have been supplied to the petitioner nor an opportunity of being heard was given to the petitioner. Thus, both the orders at Annexure-3 and Annexure-4 to the memo of the petition are in gross violation of the principles of natural justice on account of the fact that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner, it could have been pointed out that allegations levelled against her are absolutely false and frivolous. The petitioner was appointed an Anganbari Sevika w.e.f. 3rd September, 2007 and his services have been terminated vide order dated 17th September, 2008 (Annexure-4) and 10th October, 2008 (Annexure-3) without holding any enquiry. Counsel for the respondents submitted that a detailed counter affidavit has been filed and as stated therein, there was some complaints received from the villagers that petitioner is second wife to one Shri Ashutosh Mahato. A detailed enquiry was conducted by the respondents and its report is annexed as Annexure-E to the counter affidavit and on the basis of this report that she is the second wife of Shri Ashutosh Mahato, services of the petitioner have been terminated.

(2.) Having heard both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I, hereby, quash and set aside the order dated 10th October, 2008 and Order dated 17th September, 2008 (Annexure-3 and Annexure-4 to the memo of the petition respectively) passed by the respondents for the following facts and reasons:--

(3.) In view of these facts, I, hereby, quash and set aside the Order dated 10th October, 2008 (Annexure-3 to the memo of the petition) as well as the order dated 17th September, 2008 (Annexure-4 to the memo of the petition). This writ petition is allowed and disposed of with the aforesaid observation.