SAMPA SARDAR Vs. SENTU SARDAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners. The opposite party has not appeared in this case, even though the notice was validly served upon him.

(2.) THE petitioners have filed this application, challenging order dated 19.5.2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 95A of 2007 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Pakur, whereby, the application filed by the petitioners for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., was rejected by the Court below, in view of the fact that the petitioner No.1 had not been able to prove the marriage between the parties.

(3.) THE Court below, on the basis of the above evidence, came to the conclusion that the petitioner No.1 had not been able to prove her marriage with the opposite party and has, accordingly, dismissed the application.