(1.) IT reveals from the complaint that the petitioner received more than Rs. 30 lakhs after giving assurance to the complainant and other witnesses that they would get employment and compensation against the land acquired by the B.C.C.L.
(2.) It is submitted that the complainant himself was an employee of B.C.C.L. and he knows the procedure and therefore, the contention made by him in the complaint cannot be relied upon. He has not furnished a chit of paper to show that payment was made to the petitioner. The complainant has also compromised the matter with some of the accused.