KAMESHWR THAKUR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PARTY in person has submitted that he is challenging the order of suspension dated 31st January, 2012, passed by the respondents- Police Department, which is at Annexure 6 to the memo of petition, as also the order dated 10th February, 2012, which is at Annexure 10 to the interlocutory application being I.A. No. 1877 of 2012, passed by the Transport Department, whereby, the services of the petitioner i.e. party in person, which were given on deputation to the Transport Department, have been returned back to his parental department i.e. Police Department.

(2.) PARTY in person submitted that firstly he has been insulted grossly by the respondents by sending back his services to his parental department and secondly without giving an opportunity of being heard, both the orders have been passed. Thus, the party in person while praying for stay of the repatriation order, submitted that the departmental inquiry, which is pending against the party in person, may be concluded expeditiously.

(3.) IN view of the aforesaid facts and reason, there is no substance in this writ petition. Moreover, it is fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the departmental inquiry, which is pending against the petitioner, will be completed at the earliest, provided the petitioner cooperates with the same.