GOVIND CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNSEL for the petitioner submitted that the service of the present petitioner have been terminated by the respondents vide order dated 9 th May, 2011, which is at Annexure5 to the memo of the supplementary affidavit, filed by the petitioner and therefore, against this order of termination, this writ petition has been preferred.

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner submitted that the document, which is annexed with the rejoinder affidavit at page 11, reveals the fact that the petitioner has cleared standard 7th examination whereas, the respondents upon verification of the 7th standard certificate, found that it was fake and fabricated. This is a misconception of fact on the part of the respondents. Petitioner has annexed documents given by the concerned school and therefore, an order of termination deserves to be quashed and set aside.

(3.) IT is further stated by the counsel for the respondentState that fraud vitiates the whole selection process of the present petitioner and if the petitioner is too much insisting upon the evidence then also the writ jurisdiction may not be invoked by this Court by entertaining this writ petition in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.