THAKUR PRAMOD SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PERUSED the affidavit filed by the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur and also the various decisions taken by the Deputy Commissioner dated 14th March, 2007, which is submitted by contempt petitioner as Annexure-6. It appears that following order was passed by this Court on 7th September, 2007 in W.P. (PIL) No. 3449 of 2007:

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that substantially decision of the Deputy Commissioner has been implemented but few issues are left out, which can also be sorted out by amicable consultations and discussions with the private companies by the Deputy Commissioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that presently Colony is facing problem of potable water, non-availability of common toilet in the colony and one more difficultly is that high tension wire is running over the residents of the colony.

(3.) THE steps which has been taken by Deputy Commissioner concerned and the companies may be submitted to this Court in the month of August, 2012.