ANIL KUMAR Vs. CANTONMENT BOARD RAMGARH CANTT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NO one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

(2.) THIS writ petition was preferred by the petitioner for refund of Rs. 76,800/ along with interest deposited by him with the respondents in respect of allotment of a shop no. C5 and further for quashing of letter dated 5th December, 2005, by which the petitioner was asked to take possession of the shop after payment of rent at the rate of Rs. 2,111/ per month from 13th August, 2004 to 30th November, 2005, amounting to Rs. 32,957/ failing which the petitioner's security money will be forfeited and the shop would be reauctioned.

(3.) IT appears from the aforesaid facts that the petitioner has not acted in terms of notice inviting tender and failed to deposit the bid amount within the stipulated time and now even after repeated reminders by the respondentBoard and even after depositing the bid amount failed to execute the agreement in question by submitting the necessary stamp paper or executing any lease deed. In view of the aforesaid repeated default of the petitioner the respondents acted by canceling the allotment and forfeiting the bid amount in terms of the NIT in question, which facts have also not been denied by the petitioner by filing any rejoinder