ARUN SINHA Vs. AWADH BIHARI MISHRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THESE Letters Patent Appeals are decided by this common order since identical question is involved in these appeals.

(3.) LEARNED Single Judge accepted the contention of the writ petitioners in toto and observed that though they were initially appointed as untrained teachers and they were entitled to training which were provided to them by the Government in the year 1998 and that too in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The petitioners took and completed the training in the year 1999 but their result was published in the year 2002 and that too when the Court intervened. In these facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners were not at fault in not getting the training but it was the fault of the State Government. In view of the above reasons, the writ petition filed by the petitioners was allowed, hence, the present L.P.As have been preferred by the State.