SITA RAM SHARMA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this petition, the petitioner has prayed for mandatory direction, inter alia, against private respondent nos. 6 and 7, commanding upon them not to take coercive step and interfere with the petitioner's possession over the land in question. The said private respondents happen to be the landlord of the petitioner.

(2.) LEARNED J.C. to AAG, appearing on behalf of the State -respondents, submitted that the writ petition is frivolous and is not at all maintainable. According to the petitioner himself, he has taken the said plea in the suit pending in the court of Munsif and those controversies are yet to be decided by the said court. Whether the petitioner has got independent title over the land or the landlord has got title over the land is a dispute of fact, which cannot be decided in a writ jurisdiction of this Court. This writ petition is, thus, liable to be dismissed.