PRAVEEN JAIN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

(2.) THE petitioner is aggrieved by order order dated 13.07.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1-cum-Special Judge, Bokaro, in S.C. / S.T. Case No. 13 of 2009 arising out of G. R. No. 314 of 2008 whereby, the application filed by the defence for recalling the prosecution witnesses for their cross-examination again at the stage of arguments, was rejected by the Court below.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned order passed by the Court below was highly prejudiced the defence in as much as, inadvertently the witnesses could not be cross-examined on the point of place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner, accordingly, submitted that it is a fit case, in which, the defence be given an opportunity to recall the P.Ws. for their cross-examination on this point.