FULMANI TUDU Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNSEL for the petitioner is challenging the order, passed by the respondents dated 11th June, 2010 which is at Annexure7 to the memo of the present petition and it is submitted that the services of the petitioner have been terminated without giving any show cause and without holding any inquiry. The petitioner was working as Para Teacher.

(2.) COUNSEL for the respondents submitted that they have filed a detailed counter affidavit and especially in paragraph19 thereof, it has been stated that the petitioner's services have not been terminated, but, some inquiry of certain documents submitted by the petitioner, is going on and proper step/notice/notices shall be given to the petitioner for taking legal action, but, as on today, the petitioner's services have not be terminated and the petitioner is continued in service, but, there is an order not to take work from the present petitioner.

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioner submitted that if the petitioner is continued in service, the petitioner ought to be paid salary/wages/honorarium in accordance with law. Counsel for the respondents submitted that they have no much objection to make the payment of salary/wages/honorarium to the petitioner in accordance with law, rules, regulations, policies and enforceable Government orders applicable to the petitioner.