(1.) THE petitioner constable challenges the impugned orders Annexures-6 and 8, whereby the petitioner was held guilty and punishment of stoppage of two increments was imposed on him.
(2.) PETITIONER was charge sheeted for not receiving the transfer order saying that he is on leave, therefore, he will not receive the transfer order. Enquiry Officer, after examining the entire material available on record, has opined that charge against the petitioner is not proved and the petitioner is held to be innocent. Copy of the enquiry report is available on record as Annexure-5 to the petition. However, Superintendent of Police/ disciplinary authority did not agree with the enquiry report and has passed the impugned order on 22.06.2004, against which petitioner instituted an appeal , which was also dismissed on 08.01.2006 by the Deputy Inspector General of Police.
(3.) LEARNED Single Judge of this Court in the case of Anil KumarJha Versus Bihar State Electricity Board & Ors., reported in 2004(1) J C R 122 (Jhr)in paragraph 5 has observed as under: