(1.) AS prayed by Mr. V. Shivnath, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out are ignored.
(2.) THIS Civil Review Application has been filed for reviewing the order dated 1.4.2011, passed in WPC No. 1003 of 2011.
(3.) ON the other hand, the respondents have controverted the said contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners. According to them, the respondents have acted legally, and the notification under section 3D of the National Highways Act, 1956 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has also been issued. There is no finding by the appellate court that the writ court did not consider the aspect of non acquisition of plot no. 527. This review is barred by constructive res judicata. Paragraph 28 of the judgment reported in (2011) 12 SCC 69 Union of India Vs. Kushala Shetty has been relied.