SATYADEO PANDEY Vs. JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents -JSEB.

(2.) THIS instant writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: -

(3.) RESPONDENTS have appeared and filed their counter affidavit in which it has been stated in para -6 to the counter affidavit that Rs. 20,220/ -is required to be recovered for excess payment during the service period of the petitioner and it was found during the revised pay fixation by the Audit Department. They have further stated that petitioner continuously occupied the official quarter, although he retired on 28 February, 2001, which was ultimately vacated in the year 2005 pursuant to the order of this Court i.e. after four years of his retirement, therefore, respondents have charged penal rent from the petitioner as per the Board rules.