ABHIJIT GAURAV @ ROHIT Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

(2.) THE petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 379/406/417/420/403/468 of the Indian Penal Code and later on section 419 and 120B of the I.P.C. are added and they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 160 of 2009, G.R. Case No. 513 of 2009, now pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is falsely implicated in this case by the complainant only to save them from the aforesaid case which was filed by the father of the petitioner on 7.6.09 at Patna (Jakkanpur). It is further submitted by the counsel of the petitioner after the aforesaid case instituted by the father of the petitioner, Jakkanpur Police rushed to Gumla and recovered the petitioner from the house of Md. Khalil who is father of the complainant and one Ziaul Haque was arrested and he has confessed that he along with the present complainant and others, kidnapped the present petitioner and demanded a sum of Rs. 8 lakhs from the father of the petitioner. It is further further submitted that the said Ziaul Haque also accepted in his confessional statements that they have taken signature of the petitioner in the blank paper and also taken a sum of Rs. 90,000/ -from the petitioner. Therefore, the present case is a counter blast of the case filed by the father of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the complainant and other accused of the aforesaid case are insisting the petitioner to withdraw the aforesaid case otherwise they will teach the petitioner and his family members a good lesson.