RAM BILASH RAI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND,

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner was appointed as Daily Wage Mazdoor vide order dated 19.1.1995. Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was not allowed to work, therefore, he had filed W.P. (S) No. 75 of 2008 before this Court which was decided vide order dated 9.2.2009 with liberty to the petitioner to prefer representation with the respondent authorities with further direction to the respondent authorities to take decision on the representation of the petitioner.

(2.) THE impugned order, Annexure 8, was passed by the Superintending Engineer, Mechanical Circle, Road Construction Department, Dhurwa, Ranchi, respondent no. 4, on the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 30.9.2010. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30.9.2010, the petitioner has preferred present writ petition on 19.9.2012.

(3.) HON 'ble Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. and others vs. U.P. State Law Officers' association and others [ : (1994) 2 SCC 204] has held as under: