GOURI SHANKAR MOHTA Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BOTH these bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. .

(2.) THE petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case no. 8 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 63 of 2012, for the alleged offences under Sections 379, 414 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 39, 40 of the Mines and Minerals Act and Section 30 (ii) of the Coal Mines Act. It appears from the F.I.R. itself that from factory premises of the petitioners in A.B.A. No. 1156 of 2012, illegal coal was recovered by the police. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, Gouri Shankar Mohta and Madan Singh. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.