MD MAKBUL ALAM Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

(2.) THIS revision has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Judgment dated 1.2.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 25 of 2009, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Pakur, whereby in a proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the Court below has directed the petitioner to make the payment of Rs.1000/- per month as maintenance to his deserted wife and he was also directed to pay Rs. 1000/- as expenses of the proceeding.

(3.) THE petitioner had also examined himself in the Court below, but he could not prove the factum of remarriage of opposite party No. 2 with Faizul Khan. It further appears that it was admitted by the petitioner that he had married another lady. Thus, taking into consideration all these facts and the income of the petitioner, which was not denied by the petitioner in the Court below, the Court below has granted maintenance of Rs. 1000/- per month to opposite party No. 2 wife and also directed to pay Rs. 1000/- as expenses of the proceeding.