SHEO PUJAN DEVI Vs. RANCHI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 14.07.2006 passed in Misc. Petition Nos. 10/06, 8/06, 5/06, 7/06, 9/06, 6/06, whereby the restoration applications have been dismissed. The petitioners have also prayed for setting aside the order dated 19.04.2006 ( Annexure-4) passed in Misc. Appeal Nos. 17/97, 18/97, 19/97, 23/97, 26/97 and 27/97, which were dismissed for non prosecution of the appeals.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the Respondents-RRDA points out to the impugned order dated 14.07.2006, passed in restoration applications vide Annexure-5 wherein also, after hearing the complainants- appellants, i.e. the petitioners herein, the learned Tribunal categorically recorded that all these appeals are related to the year 1996 and the appellants were not found to be appearing in most of the dates for last ten years. Thereafter the appeals were dismissed on 19.04.2006. The learned Tribunal therefore found no reason to revive the appeals while dismissing the restoration application by the impugned order hereinabove.