(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution.
(2.) THE petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 364, 365, 498 -A, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No. 8 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 87 of 2010.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been submitted that there is no eyewitness to the occurrence and even though, the photograph of the dead body has been identified to be that of the wife of the petitioner, from the statements of witnesses recorded in the case diary, it would appear that wife of the petitioner had become traceless from 3.1.2010. In this connection, the statement of landlord of the house is also available in the case diary, which shows that the victim is traceless since 3.1.2010. Learned counsel accordingly, submitted that that the dead body which was recovered on 24.12.2009 cannot be that of the wife of the petitioner. Learned counsel accordingly, prayed for bail.