PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA Vs. DEVANTI DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the opposite party in spite of valid service of notice upon her.

(2.) THIS revision is directed against the judgment dated 8.6.2010 passed by learned Principal Judge. Family Court, Gumla in M. Case No. 51 of 2006, whereby the petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs. 4.000/ - per month as maintenance to his deserted Wife and two children.

(3.) IN these facts and circumstances and upon appraisal of the evidence brought on record, the Court below has come to the conclusion that the petitioner is living In a joint family and there is income of Rs. 15,000/ - per month and as such, the petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs. 4.000/ - per month as maintenance to his wife and two children.