MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the State and the learned c ounsel for the complainant.

(2.) PETITIONERS are accused in a case registered under Sections 420/120B of the I.P.C.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the complainant has filed counter affidavit in this case and he has submitted that the co-accused Sandeep Kumar Jha forged a power of Attorney allegedly given by the complaint and his brothers and on the basis of that forged document all the accused persons (the present petitioners) in conspiracy and connivance have got the entire lands of the complainant and his brothers, transferred to their names. It is is further submitted that from the perusal of the power of attorney dated 15.5.2008, it is clear that the three photographs affixed on the power of Attorney showing that of Suman Kumar Choudhary, Sujeet Kumar Choudhary and Ajit Kumar Choudhary (the complainant) are not the photographs of the complainant and his two brothers. The signature of these three persons are also not of the complainant and his two brothers and to support his contention, a photocopy of the said power attorney dated 15.5.2008 is annexed in the counter affidavit as Annexure-A.